We previously mentioned that divine perception can be either valid, offering a clear view, or invalid, leading to inaccuracies. This type of cognition operates on a completely different level than our own, which is restricted by the six senses. Human language simply cannot capture the complexities of time, space, and phenomena that divine perception can access. Our words are limited by our senses; we label things based on what we perceive, not the full reality that divine powers might glimpse.
Imagine I am holding a wooden board. The word "board" reaches your ears, and your brain instantly conjures an image of a similar object. This is how our language works - words act as labels for things we have experienced. But what about things beyond our experience? Divine perception might reveal images unlike anything we have ever encountered. How can we describe them with our limited vocabulary? We are left with terms like "incomprehensible" - basically admitting, "This is beyond explanation!" It is like saying, "You wouldn't understand even if I tried." Of course, a truly enlightened being like an Arhat would not be so blunt. Their words would be filled with kindness.
Therefore, it is impossible to accurately describe these experiences using human language. The scope and range of these perceptions are far broader, encompassing a vast expanse of time and space. Our human perception of time and space is limited, while these experiences transcend those limitations. Not only do they encompass a far greater expanse of time and space, but the very nature of time and space itself is different. For instance, imagine a single glass of water containing ten thousand sentient beings in the bardo state. This is beyond our capacity to comprehend. While some scientific theories touch upon these concepts, they often fall short, such as the notion of twelve parallel universes, which is purely speculative.
Even the most precise mathematical calculations can be flawed. This can happen even if the calculations themselves are done perfectly. The issue arises when the foundation of those calculations, the underlying philosophical assumptions, are flawed. Within a specific range, these calculations might still yield useful results. For example, calculus is a powerful tool for solving real-world problems. However, from a philosophical perspective, calculus is flawed as it operates on the assumption of infinite divisibility and absolute certainty. In reality, the world does not always behave in such a perfectly predictable way.
These philosophical errors do not have a significant impact on our daily lives. Even without learning calculus, we can live comfortably. So, most people do not pay much attention to these issues. However, if you are pursuing ultimate truth, you need to be meticulous and not settle for mere practicality. While approximations may suffice in everyday life, when it comes to ultimate truth, there is no room for compromise. This is not about personal preferences or practical considerations; it is about fundamental truths. As the saying goes, "Words cannot express, and thoughts cannot grasp." Even the most delicate and precise aspects of human language and mind cannot fully capture or comprehend it. No matter how deep and profound our thoughts may be, they fall short. This highlights the uncompromising nature of Buddhism.
Excerpted from: Cognition and Expression Part Two
