Original Articles
DEBUG: BODY_LIST.HTML RELOADED
PREMIUM LIST ACTIVE - INLINE STYLES APPLIED
Same Words, Different Meanings: The Fluidity of View, Practice, and State

Same Words, Different Meanings: The Fluidity of View, Practice, and State

It's not that certain expressions can only be views, others only practice, and others only states. Any language can change meaning in different scenarios, contexts, and cultural backgrounds.

How to Give Rise to Genuine Renunciation (1)?

How to Give Rise to Genuine Renunciation (1)?

In short, to give rise to genuine renunciation, one must rely on long-term hearing, reflection, and practice to cultivate three correct core views.

How to Give Rise to Genuine Renunciation (3)?

How to Give Rise to Genuine Renunciation (3)?

Only by doing this over the long term will you gradually come to understand the importance of practice, what life should be used for, and what this world is really about.

How to Give Rise to Genuine Renunciation (2)?

How to Give Rise to Genuine Renunciation (2)?

Once a correct worldview is strong enough, our emotional side will naturally give rise at least to the experience of mere emptiness. We will genuinely feel that this world is illusory. Directly perceiving and experiencing this world as illusory—this is precisely what is meant by mere emptiness.

From View to Realization: Expressions of Cognition in Buddhist Practice

From View to Realization: Expressions of Cognition in Buddhist Practice

Given the vast range of expressive elements in Buddhism, we can categorize them into seven key types:1. Direct Perception 2. Views 3. Experiences 4. Practice 5. Insights 6. Enlightenment 7. States of Realization

Don’t Be Misled by Feel-Good Spiritual Advice

Don’t Be Misled by Feel-Good Spiritual Advice

Listeners should be very cautious about this as well. Not only should they discern the views and methods of practice, but they should also understand that the same language can express different experiences and states of realization.

Why Brain-Based Cognition Inevitably Generates Attachment to Self and Phenomena?

Why Brain-Based Cognition Inevitably Generates Attachment to Self and Phenomena?

Brain-based cognition inevitably believes that once the brain dies, life ends, and thus doesn't believe in samsara. Since brain-based cognition cannot see the function of the mind stream, it only believes in cause and effect on the physical realm, not in the causality of the mind.

True Proof Arises Through Practice: Individual-Based Self-Knowing

True Proof Arises Through Practice: Individual-Based Self-Knowing

As these illusions dissolve, we see the true Vajrasattva—the formless, featureless essence, the real emptiness where ‘all phenomena are illusory.’ Beyond illusion lies the essence. And what follows this revelation? The realization that karmic obstacles inherently lack substance—true repentance.

The Transformative Path of Consciousness-Based Cognition

The Transformative Path of Consciousness-Based Cognition

When you directly realize the nature of Emptiness through your own mind, you'll no longer believe that brain death marks the end of life. Instead, you'll develop a strong conviction in the cycles of rebirth and the potential for liberation.

The Six Senses Are Invalid Cognition: “Direct Perception” as a Human Convention

The Six Senses Are Invalid Cognition: “Direct Perception” as a Human Convention

What we consider as direct perception through the six senses is a convention. For instance, what a normal human eye sees is defined as direct perception. However, from the ultimate Buddhist perspective, all six senses are invalid cognition.

Mind-Based Cognition: The Brain and Senses as Mere Instruments

Mind-Based Cognition: The Brain and Senses as Mere Instruments

Today's quantum mechanics has greatly altered our understanding of space-time, but it hasn't led to a massive qualitative change in our cognition.

From Probability to Causality: The Fundamental Limits of Scientific Cognition

From Probability to Causality: The Fundamental Limits of Scientific Cognition

Constrained by the subject and the method of observation, we cannot see the deeper reasons for the emergence and development of things, so we don't believe in the law of causality.

How can we simply explain the existence of samsara through Madhyamaka?

How can we simply explain the existence of samsara through Madhyamaka?

Although we can directly perceive matter, analysis—and even modern science—has already shown that matter lacks real substance and does not possess the capacity to propel samsara or generate phenomena.

The Inherent Limits of Brain Cognition

The Inherent Limits of Brain Cognition

The human brain has inherent limitations. We attempt to overcome these by altering our environment and using tools like mathematics and logic. However, this approach rarely leads to fundamental changes in our perception.

Consciousness-Only: Transforming the World Begins with Transforming the Mind

Consciousness-Only: Transforming the World Begins with Transforming the Mind

The main changes should be made to internal conditions: on one hand, accumulating merit and purifying obscurations through the brain and senses, and on the other hand, halting brain and sensory activity to shift the direction of cognition.

Cognitive Transformation, Supernatural Powers, and the Causality

Cognitive Transformation, Supernatural Powers, and the Causality

Thus, cognitive abilities change, the perception of space and time shifts, resulting in supernatural powers; values change, leading to the belief in the law of causality.

Matter Cannot Account for Cognition: From the Brain to Alayavijnana

Matter Cannot Account for Cognition: From the Brain to Alayavijnana

Therefore, the fusion of sperm and egg is merely one possibility, an external manifestation of the Alayavijnana preceding the next life. This understanding of rebirth within consciousness cognition does not equate the union of sperm and egg with the production of consciousness.

After Denying Matter and God, What Remains?

After Denying Matter and God, What Remains?

What underpins all phenomena? If not matter, then perhaps God or our own minds. Thus, the philosophical proposition that consciousness can generate everything aligns seamlessly with Madhyamaka. When we dismantle all constructs, matter loses its solidity; it emerges solely from the mind.

Does cognition originate from matter?

Does cognition originate from matter?

Imagine middle school textbooks teaching us that the material world is always in motion. According to this perspective, spirit emerges as a result of this dynamic matter. But here’s the catch: this philosophical stance can be quite unsettling—it’s essentially considered the root of all evil!

The Fundamental Difference Between Brain Cognition and Consciousness Cognition

The Fundamental Difference Between Brain Cognition and Consciousness Cognition

Moreover, since we acknowledge that consciousness is the essence, by turning back, as long as we find our own consciousness, we find the essence, we find the ultimate truth on which this world is established.